Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22304 (AP)

KANDALA LAKSHMI PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17952/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010349772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17952/2024 Between: 1. KANDALA LAKSHMI PRASAD, REP. BY RALITY INFRA GROUP, PLOT NO.53, SECTOR 5, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MVP COLONY POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. VADAPALLI NARAYANA MURTHY RAJU, S/O. JANAKI RAMA RAJU, FLAT NO.401, RAJAPUSHPAK PALACE, SEETHAMMADHARA NE, VISAKHAPATNAM-530013. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMA GOPAL 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17952/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in interfering with civil disputes and the personal liberty of the Petitioner at the instance of 5th Respondent is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes and the personal liberty of the Petitoner, in the interest of justice.…” 2. Heard Sri G.Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner through V.C., and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17952/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS