NAGENDRA SINGH v. BRANCH MANAGER CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK
CRMP/323/2019 · 2026-06-18
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22301 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22301 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:24956
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 323 of 2019 Nagendra Singh S/o Kanta Prasad Singh Aged About 40 Years Occupation Contractor, R/o Vijay Marg, Sangam Chowk, Ambikapur, Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus Branch Manager Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Branch Mahaveerpur, P. S. Jainagar, Through Branch Manage, Diwakar Dubey S/o Baleshwar Dubey, Aged About 59 Years Occupation Branch Manager Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Branch Mahaveerpur, P. S. Jainagar, Tahsil Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Order
on Board
19.06.2026
1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.06.19 19:52:04 +0530
2
2. Mr. N. Naha Roy, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent, is present.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the order dated 22.06.2018 and subsequent order dated 10.08.2018, 15.10.2018 and 17.12.2018 and the subsequent proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambikapur in complaint case No. 1016 of 2018 parties name Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh State Gramin Bank, Branch Mahaveerpur vs. Nagendra Singh, in the interest of justice.”
4. As per the status report received, the trial was concluded on
22.11.2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, and nothing survives for consideration by this Court in the present petition.
5. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Brijmohan