Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2230 (KAR)

V PRADEEPA v. DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD

WP/46800/2019 · 2026-02-24

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11327 WP No. 46800 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 46800 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. V. PRADEEPA S/O LATE Y.H.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 2. V SANDEEPA S/O LATE Y.H.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 3. G B LEELAVATHI W/O LATE Y.H.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT HARIGE, B.H.ROAD, SHIMOGA CITY - 577 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANTHOSH B .,ADVOCATE)(ABSENT) AND: 1. DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD MAIN OFFICE BALARAJ URS RODA, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RECOVERY OFFICER DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11327 WP No. 46800 of 2019 NO.441, BALRAJ URS ROD, SHVIAMOGGA - 577 201. 3. Y.H. NAGARAJ S/O HALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT B.H.ROAD, 1ST CROSS, SHIMOGGA - 577 201. 4. G S NAGARAJ S/O GANAPATHI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS GENERAL MANAGER, MPS, SURAKSHA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, 1ST CROSS, RAVINDA NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO QUASH THE VIDE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 38A (4) DATED 04.09.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 ANNX-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Petitioners are before this Court being aggrieved by the notice issued by the respondent under Rule 38A(4) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11327 WP No. 46800 of 2019 2. It appears petitioners has filed a suit for partition which is also pending consideration. 3. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner consecutively. Petition is of the year 2019. Since the petitioner has already filed a suit and he seemed to be not interested in pursuing the matter, petition is dismissed. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12