Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2230 (CHH)

PRIYA VASING v. MR. PARDESHI SIDDHARTH KOMAL

CONT/1711/2025 · 2026-02-03

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:6260 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1711 of 2025 1. Priya Vasing D/o Shri Ramesh Rao Vasing Aged About 42 Years R/o C-15, Sone Ganga Colony, Near Science College, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Shanti Ghritlahre W/o Dilip Kumar Ghritlehre, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Guma, Post Bitkuli, The. And Thana Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1. Mr. Pardeshi Siddharth Komal Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Mr. Rituraj Raghuvanshi, Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Mr. Vijay Tande, District Education Officer (D.E.O.) Bilaspur, Office Of D.E.O. Bilaspur, Opposite Collectorate Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Rameshwari Kumari, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 04/02/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of the order passed in WPS No. 3234/2025 dated 07.05.2025 between Priya Vasing and Another vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, wherein this court has disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authorities to consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioners raising their grievance, in accordance with law. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the direction issued by this Court in the order dated 07.05.2025 passed in WPS No. 3234/2025 has been complied with and the order has been passed on 28.01.2026 granting benefit to petitioners for which they were entitled for according to the respondents. 3. On due consideration of the above submission of learned counsel for respondents, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents stands dropped. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged and the contempt petitioner is accordingly closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE