CHITRANJAN PASWAN ALIAS CHITRANJAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./3427/2025 · 2026-01-28
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 223 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 223 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:JHHC:2127
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
Cr.M.P. No.3427 of 2025
---- 1) CHITRANJAN PASWAN ALIAS CHITRANJAN, aged about 25 years, son of Vimal Paswan, R/O PURAN ROBERTGANJ, P.O. AND P.S.
ROBERTGANJ, DIST SONBHADRA, UTTAR PRADESH, 231216, ALSO R/O WARD NO 1, VILLAGE KOSDIHRA, P.O. PARSODIH, P.S.
BHAWANATHPUR, KOSDEHRA, DISTRICT GARHWA, JHARKHAND 822112 2) ANJANI KUMAR SAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEAR, SON OF RAM NIVAS SAH, R/O VILLAGE KARAIL KONE ROBERTGANJ, P.O. AND P.S.
ROBERTGANJ, DISTRICT SONBHADRA, UTTAR PRADESH -231216 3) ANIL KUMAR BHUIYAN @ ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, SON OF SATU BHUIYA, R/O VILLAGE KAJRU KALAN PANDU, P.O.
KAJRU KHURD, P.S. PANDU, DISTRICT PALAMU, JHARKHAND 4) SURAJ KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, SON OF RAJKUMAR RAM, R/O WARD NO 2, VILLAGE CHATARPUR, P.O. KALYANPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT GARHWA, 822114 5) OMPRAKASH SAH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, SON OF RAM SAH @ RAM PRATAP SAH, R/O VILLAGE HARIHARPUR, P.S.
BHAWANATHUR, DISTRICT GARHWA, PIN 822120 6) BIKASH CHAUDHARY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, SON OF LAKSHMI CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE TUMBA, P.O. RAMDHIHRA, P.S. ROHTAS, DIST ROHTAS, BIHAR, ALSO R/O WARD NO 9, LOHARDAGA, P.O. HARIHARPUR, P.S. BHAWANATHPUR, DISTRICT GARHWA, JHARKHAND 822120…… …. .... Petitioner(s) -- Versus --
State of Jharkhand …… ….. .... …. Opp. Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
----
For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Kanishka Deo, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Prabir Kr Chatterjee, Advocate
---- 2/28.01.2026 This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 23.09.2025 passed in ABA No. 5409 of 2025.
2
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners happened to be drivers of different trucks and they were outside the State with the consignment loaded on the trucks and in view of that the petitioners have not been able to surrender before the learned court within the stipulated time.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that the petitioners have already been granted anticipatory bail and in spite of that, they have not surrendered.
4.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, two weeks’ further time, from today, is hereby extended to surrender before the learned court concerned.
5.
Order dated 23.09.2025 passed in ABA No. 5409 of 2025 is, hereby, modified to the above extent.
6.
The rest of the Order dated 23.09.2025 passed in ABA No. 5409 of 2025 is kept intact.
7.
This petition is accordingly disposed of.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated : 28th January, 2026 SI/