Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:38078 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1125 of 2026
Decided on: 08.09.2026 ________________________________________________ Raj Kumari ....Petitioner Versus
Abhishek Jain & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that respondents/department has complied with the judgment under reference.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed.
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, as available to her under the law, if 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:38078 ) she is still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
8th September, 2026 Judge (raman)