Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22288 (CHH)

YOGESH VINAYAK SHINDE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1752/2019 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24945 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1752 of 2019 Yogesh Vinayak Shinde S/o Late Vinayak Shinde Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. 165/a, Sunder Bihar Colony, Phase -II , Kurud Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Supela Tehsil Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State/Respondent : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2 Ms. Ritika Verma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent, is present. 3 By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.06.19 18:34:12 +0530 2 “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash / set aside the order dated 30.03.2019 passed in CRR No. 268/2018 passed by the First Additional Session Judge, Durg looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 4 As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 13.05.2023. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 5 Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6 Interim order, if any stands vacated. 7 Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Anu