Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22287 (PNJ)

SURINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/31044/2026 · 2026-05-27

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CRM-M-31044-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 Surinder Singh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. B.S. Chahal, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for seeking directions to respondent No.2 to get an investigation conducted in a fair and impartial manner on the representation dated 03.05.2026 submitted by the petitioner from some high rank official and to take appropriate legal action against the accused persons. 2. It apparent from the perusal of the representation as well as the petition, that there is no iota of allegations that the respondent-authority is not conducting a fair investigation or any reasons on the basis whereof, this Court may assume that the respondent-authority discharging statutory functions are biased or had acted in malice against the petitioner. 3. Seemingly, the present petition has been filed only to pressurize the investigating agency so as to steer the investigation to the lines of the petitioner herein. 4. The present petition is accordingly dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 27.05.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.29 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document