KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. VEERESHA
WP/39184/2025 · 2026-06-17
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22282 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22282 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29525 WP No. 39184 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 39184 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, DAVANAGERE DIVISION, DAVANAGERE-577001.
BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
VEERESHA, S/O. BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, DRIVER, BADGE NO.150, HARAPPANAHALLI DEPOT AT AND POST HAMAN KALLURU VIA KAVITHALA MANVI TALUK, RAICHUR DISTRICT-584120. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29525 WP No. 39184 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Smt.Renuka.H.R., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.L.Shekar, counsel for respondent appeared in person.
2. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction quashing the order dated 03.04.2004 in SLA No.934/2015 (in I.D.No.148/2025) passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, (Annexure-B). (ii) Such other writ, directions or order, as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and expedient in the circumstances of the case.
3. Counsel for the respective parties presented several
contentions. Sri.L.Shekar, counsel appearing on behalf of the workman fairly submits that the workman has challenged the order of dismissal by raising a dispute before the appropriate forum. Hence, he has no objection to allow the serial application.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29525 WP No. 39184 of 2025
Moreover, the Tribunal while considering the application under Section 33(2)(b) had erroneously dealt with the matter on the merits of the case. The Court acknowledges the fair submission made by counsel for the respondent.
4. Taking note of the said submission the serial application under Section 33(2)(b) of the I.D. Act is allowed.
5. The
order dated 03.04.2024 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in SLA No.934/2015 is quashed.
6. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14