DHARMA JAGANNATH PATIL AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SEC. EDUCATION DEPT. AND ORS
WP/6243/2026 · 2026-08-20
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2228 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2228 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
9-WP-6241-2026 @ Ors.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6241 OF 2026 Zaheer Ahmed Mohammed Husain … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6243 OF 2026 Dharma Jagannath Patil and Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5190 OF 2019 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 21667 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5190 OF 2019 Vimal Dada Raut @ Vimal Pralhad Sonawane and Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 21614 OF 2026 Ansari Raees Ahmed Mushtaque Ahmed Andors … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents __________________________ Mr. Sudhir Nandode a/w Ms. Priti Bhavsar for the Petitioners. Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for Respondent/State in WP/6241/2026, WP/6243/ 2026, WP/5190/2019 and IA/21667/2026. Purti Parab 1/3 PURTI PRASAD PARAB Digitally signed by PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2026.08.21 12:13:05 +0530
9-WP-6241-2026 @ Ors.doc Mr. Sachin H. Kankal, AGP for Respondent/State in WP(ST)/21614/2026. Mr. Pritam Runwal for Respondent No.4 in WP(ST)/21614/2026. Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis for the Respondent/Zilla Parishad Nashik in all Writ Petitions. __________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 20 th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has placed before us an
order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1212 of 2019 dated 23rd July, 2026. He states that the present matters can be disposed of in terms of the same order which was passed in Writ Petition No. 1212 of 2019.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Zilla Parishad does not dispute this position. He fairly states that same order can be passed in these Petitions also.
2. In light of the position as stated above, and when both the parties are ad idem on this issue, we are of the opinion that all the Petitions can be disposed of on the same terms and conditions on which the order dated 23rd July, 2026 was passed in Writ Petition No. 1212 of
2019. Hence the following order.
3. The Petitioners to approach the Chief Executive Officer of Purti Parab 2/3
9-WP-6241-2026 @ Ors.doc Nashik Zilla Parishad by making a representation along with copy of
judgment of the Nagpur Bench as well as copy of the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1212 of 2019.
4. The case of the Petitioners be considered by the Chief Executive Officer of the Nashik Zilla Parishad in light of the aforesaid orders.
5. The Petitioners to prefer a representation alongwith copy of this order and necessary action in terms of the said representation be taken by the Chief Executive Officer as expeditiously as possible in any case within a period of ten weeks from the date of making of the representation.
6. All the Writ Petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
7. Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Purti Parab 3/3