Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22278 (PNJ)

PARDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS v. ARAVIND KUMAR MK

COCP/2469/2026 · 2026-05-29

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CHANDIGARH 111 COCP-2469-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 Pardeep Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Aravind Kumar M.K. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harish Goyal, Advocate (Through Video Conferencing) & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Anirudh Malhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Ratik Chatrath Kapur, Advocate for the respondent. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that in pursuance of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 10.02.2026, a detailed speaking order dated 26.05.2026 has been passed. A copy of the said speaking order has been handed over to this Court during the course of arguments which is taken on record and marked as Mark “A” and a copy of the same has also been given to learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are not satisfied with the said speaking order and thus, the present contempt petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to challenge the said speaking order, in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. 29.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document