Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22276 (AP)

MUNNANGI RAVI TEJA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17537/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010344272024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17537/2024 Between: 1. MUNNANGI RAVI TEJA, S/O NARASIMHAM, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. FLAT NO-101, SANVY RESIDENCY, PLOT NO-6, PUPPALAGUDA, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD. 2. JILLELAMUDI MAMATHA, W/O MUNNANGI RAVI TEJA AGED 29 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO-101, SANVY RESIDENCY, PLOT NO-6, PUPPALAGUDA, MANIKONDA, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KANDUKURU RURAL POLICE STATION, KANDUKURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. VUNNAM MAHESH, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED 40 YEARS OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O VARAPARLAVARI PALEM, SIVALAYAM ROAD, KANDUKUR, SPSR NELLORE DIST., 5. VUNNAM MANASA, W/O. NAVUURI MALLIKARJUN AGED 42 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O 22ND WARD KANDUKURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17537/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly that of Respondent, at the instance of Respondents 4 and 5, in harassing the petitioners by frequently summoning them to attend before him and insisting to pay the amount of 13,40,000/- alleged to be due to 5th Respondent under complaint in Crime No-82 of 2024 and frequently interfering with Petitioners peaceful living and liberty, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly the 4th Respondent not to interfere in any manner with Petitioners peaceful living and personal liberty nor call them to Police station.…” 2. Heard Ms. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent- police are summoning the petitioners to the police station under the guise of Crime No.82 of 2024 at the instance of the 5th respondent and insisting them to pay the amount alleged to be due to the 5th respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they are not calling the petitioners to the police station. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed to follow the due process of law regarding 4 the crime which has been registered against the petitioners. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17537/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS