2026:UHC:1482 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No. 477 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicants Sunita Yadav and her husband Ram Naresh Yadav are praying for anticipatory bail in relation to FIR dated 22.04.2025 bearing FIR No. 153 of 2025 registered at P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun, wherein both of them have been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 447, 504, 506, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B of IPC. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that the allegations as alleged in the FIR appear to be civil in nature and taking into consideration all these aspects the Coordinate Bench has granted interim bail subject to certain conditions and the applicants never misused the same. 5. The State filed their counter affidavit and in response thereto the rejoinder affidavit has also been filed. In the counter affidavit it is contended that prima facie the offences are made 2026:UHC:1482 out against the applicants. Learned Brief Holder also submits that the investigation has already been completed and after collecting all credible evidences, the charge sheet has been filed. 6. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that though the charge sheet has been filed but during investigation both the applicants fully cooperated with the concerned I.O. and never misused the conditions as stipulated by the Coordinate Bench while granting interim protection and since now after filing of the charge sheet still there is an apprehension of arrest, therefore, the interim bail granted by the Coordinate Bench be made absolute. 7. On the other side, learned Brief Holder in response to this also fairly submits that the applicants never misused the conditions as stipulated by the Coordinate Bench while granting interim protection and furthermore, there is no need of further custodial interrogation of the applicants. 8. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that earlier the Coordinate Bench granted interim protection to both the applicants with certain conditions which were never misused and both of them cooperated with the investigation and now the 2026:UHC:1482 charge sheet has been filed, and as such, there is no need for further interrogation, therefore, this Court is of the view that the interim bail granted by the Coordinate Bench to the applicants on 09.05.2025 be made absolute. 9. In such view of the matter, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of finally and the interim bail granted by the Coordinate Bench dated 09.05.2025 is made absolute. It is further made clear that the applicants shall join the trial court proceedings on each and every date without seeking any unnecessary adjournment and will not make any attempt to influence the witnesses, failing which, the prosecution is free to move an application for cancelling their anticipatory bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.03.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:1482