Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:38257 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1189 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.09.2026 Madan Lal ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated nil along with copy of office order dated 05.09.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur vide order dated 05.09.2026, being a cadre controlling authority of O.T Category. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 05.09.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 09, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2