APHC010349382019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1124/2019 Between: 1. SIMHADRI THAMBI SUBBA RAO, S/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC TEACHER IN PEDAAUTPALLI VILLAGE, R/O PEDAAUTPALLI VILLAGE, UNGURURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SIMHADRI BHULAKSHMI, W/O S.T.SUBBA RAO, AGE 32 YEARS, 3. SIMHADRI VAMSIJA, D/O T.SUBBA RAO, AGE 19 YEARS, 4. SIMHADRI RAVALIJA, D/O T.SUBBA RAO, AGE 17 YEARS, 5. SIMHADRI MOKSHITH, S/O T.SUBBA RAO, AGE 17 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF D.NO 21/11-32/5C, P.V.SUBHARAO VEEDHI, NETHAJI ROADM MADHURA NAGAR, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order in Crl.MP No.111/2019 in MC.No.611/2018 dt.02.08.2019 on the file of the court of the XIV Addl. District Judge Cum Addl. Family Judge, Vijayawada, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. EATHAKOTA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 21438 2. PILLI HARSHINI 3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: JUDGEMENT: This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’ ) by the Petitioner, aggrieved by the Order dated 02.08.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.111 of 2019 in MC No.611 of 2018 the file of the Court of XIV Additional District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Judge, Additional Family Court, Vijayawada. As per the directions of this Court on 20.12.2025, Petitioner and respondents 2 to 5 are present before this Court and are identified by their respective learned counsels. At the time of hearing, Sri E.Venkat Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.P.Harshini, learned counsel for respondents 2 to 5 would submit that matter is compromised out of Court, divorce is granted to the Petitioner and respondent No.2 and no further orders are necessary in this criminal revision case. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. Considering the submissions made, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 27.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Criminal Revision Case No. 1124 of 2019 27.01.2026 Mjl /*