CWP-170 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ramanjot Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. concerned in not deciding the P-6), has propelled instant writ petition, as cast under Article 226 of India, for issuance of a Mandamus 2. submits that, at this stage, the petitioner direction is passed upon (supra), in a time bound manner. 3. Punjab, who of the petition, passed upon (supra) within a stipulated time period. 17044-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision: Ramanjot Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Satinder Pal Singh Dhanesar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The lackadaisical and indolent approach of the authorities concerned in not deciding the legal notice ), has propelled the petitioner to approach this Court through the instant writ petition, as cast under Article 226 of India, for issuance of a Mandamus. At the outset, learned counsel for submits that, at this stage, the petitioner direction is passed upon the respondents (supra), in a time bound manner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, learned who is present in Court, upon being served with an advance copy of the petition, submits that he has no objection upon the respondent(s) concerned to ) within a stipulated time period. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17044-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Satinder Pal Singh Dhanesar, Advocate, The lackadaisical and indolent approach of the authorities legal notice dated 14.04.2026 (Annexure to approach this Court through the instant writ petition, as cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that, at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case, a the respondents to decide the legal notice , learned Assistant Advocate General, is present in Court, upon being served with an advance copy no objection, in case a direction is the respondent(s) concerned to decide the legal notice s The lackadaisical and indolent approach of the authorities Annexure to approach this Court through the the Constitution of fairly would be satisfied in case, a ce Advocate General, is present in Court, upon being served with an advance copy in case a direction is decide the legal notice AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-170 4. the parties, behalf of a Mandamus upon take a final decision on the legal notice weeks from the receipt of a certified cop 5. opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner. 27.05.2026 Ak Sharma 17044-2026 (O&M) -2- In view of the abovesaid stand set out by learned counsel for the parties, and since a bona fide and innocuous the petitioner, the instant writ petition is a Mandamus upon the competent authority, amongst the respondents, take a final decision on the legal notice (supra), from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable said stand set out by learned counsel for innocuous prayer has been made on the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of, by issuing the competent authority, amongst the respondents, to (supra), within a period of eight y of this order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No said stand set out by learned counsel for on by issuing to eight Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document