Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2226 (JHR)

ATAULLAH SIKANDAR v. GENERAL MANAGER (REGION) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

C.M.P./917/2024 · 2026-03-10

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6288 1 C.M.P. No. 917 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 917 of 2024 Ataullah Sikandar aged about 48 years, son of Mohammad Mojibullah Ansari, Resident of House of Mohammad Ayaz Bari, House No. 63, Near Old High Court Building, Rahmat Colony, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist. Ranchi- 834001(Jharkhand) presently residing at R-295, Section -21, Jal Vayu Bihar, NOIDA-201301, P.O. & P.S. Gautam Budha Nagar, District- NOIDA (Uttar Pradesh) …......... Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1.General Manager (Region), Food Corporation of India Regional Office, Block A, New Collectarait Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 2.Managing Director, Food Corporation of India (Vigilance Division), 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, P.O. & P.S.- Connaught Place, Dist- New Delhi 3.Executive Director (North), Food Corporation of India Zonal Office (Noida) A-2A, A-2B, Section 24, P.O. & P.S. Gautambudha Nagar, Noida-201301 (Uttar Pradesh) 4.Deputy General Manager (Co-ord), Vigilance Division, FCI Headquarters, New Delhi, P.O. P.S. and District New Delhi ........... Opposite Party(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, Advocate For the O.P.-FCI : Mr. Shubham Sinha, A.C to Mr. Nipun Bakshi 18/10.03.2026 The present C.M.P. has been filed for modification of the order dated 01.09.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2013 of 2023 by this Court to the extent that departmental proceeding may be extended for a further period of two years so that the case of the petitioner is not prejudiced in the criminal trial. 2. There is a claim and counter claim. But that is not an issue in the present case as the petitioner has been compulsorily retired, which gives rise to fresh cause of action. 3. In that view of the matter, the present C.M.P. is disposed of reserving rights with the parties to work out their remedy in accordance with law. 4. In view of the aforesaid order, the interim order 29.10.2024 2026:JHHC:6288 2 C.M.P. No. 917 of 2024 stands vacated. Consequently, I.A. No. 2740 of 2026 to that effect also stands disposed of. 5. Office is directed to return the sealed covered enquiry report to the learned counsel for the opposite party- FCI. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 10.03.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026