IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CR-4525-2026 Date of decision :27.05.2026 KAILASH GIRI @ KELAS GIRI ... PETITIONER VERSUS GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KANJANU AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the Court to decide his application (CM-92-2025) under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC, titled as ‘Kailash Giri Vs. Gram Panchayat’ expeditiously. Admittedly, the same was filed in the year 2025 and the suit from which it arose is also pending before the Court. 2. In view of the facts and material placed before this Court, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to decide the suit as well as the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC expeditiously as early as possible keeping in view the pendency before it in accordance with law. 3. Disposed of accordingly. MANOJ KUMAR 2026.05.27 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4525-2026 ` -2- 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. 27.05.2026 (PARMOD GOYAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.05.27 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document