Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22258 (AP)

Garapati Suryanarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22831/2020 · 2026-01-19

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010344112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22831/2020 Between: GARAPATI SURYANARAYANA,, S/O. SEETARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.MANDAPALLI VILLAGE, DAMMAPETA MANDAL, BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, 0/O. D.G.P. OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. VAMSIDHAR, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 0/O. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. N KISHORE, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 0/O. D.G.P. OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SIVAJI, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr.Kranthi Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for Sri G.Kondala Rao, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, requested that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 20.01.2026 PRA 3 09 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22831 of 2020 Date: 20.01.2026 PRA