Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22255 (KAR)

SRI S KRISHNA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9774/2015 · 2026-06-17

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29781 WP No. 9774 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9774 OF 2015 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: SRI S KRISHNA MURTHY S/O LATE SAMPANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, SAMPANNA LAYOUT, KALIDASA ROAD, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, KACHARKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE-560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.VENKATESH Y., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. KUMARA PARK WEST BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-20 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, SIDDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 01 Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29781 WP No. 9774 of 2015 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BANGALORE - 01. 5. ROOPA W/O MANIVANNAN P.S. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 6. MANIVANNAN P.S. S/O LATE.P.SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS BOTH R/AT K.M.C. RESIDENCY, FLAT NO.202, 2ND CROSS, RAMDEV GARDEN KACHARAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560084 [AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 28.03.2016] …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA DIWAKAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R4; SRI.N.R. JAGADEESHWAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI.K.NANDA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE NOTIFICATION DATED 14.5.1980 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND SY.NO. 57/2 IS CONCERNED SITUATED AT KACHARKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAVA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE- A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29781 WP No. 9774 of 2015 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner, even though the case was called twice. 2. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7