Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22254 (PNJ)

SUMITRA DEVI v. DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL II AND ORS

CWP/14779/2026 · 2026-05-27

Suvir Sehgal, Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 194 CWP-14779-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SUMITRA DEVI ...Petitioner Versus DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Sandeep Singh Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Bank ***** SUVIR SEHGAL , J. (ORAL) CM-8832-CWP-2026 Application is allowed, as prayed for. Annexures appended along with the application are taken on record, and are renumbered as Annexures P-4 to P-8. CWP-14779-2026 1. Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was proceeded against ex parte before Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 02.11.2022 Annexure P-7, without being served and by order dated 06.02.2023 Annexure P-8, Original Application filed by Bank was accepted and a recovery certificate was issued. Counsel states that petitioner has moved an application (MA-104-2025) before the DRT for setting aside ex parte decree. He submits that application is not being adjudicated. HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.30 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-14779-2026 (O&M) (2) 2. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DRT to dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. 3. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for interim relief before the DRT. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 27, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.30 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment