Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22254 (JHR)

RITESH KUMAR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7098/2026 · 2026-07-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:22379] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7098 of 2026 ------ Ritesh Kumar Prasad, Aged 43 years, Son of Late Harish Chandra Prasad, Resident of – Village P.O.- Mahmada, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan, Bihar. Presently Resident of – Near Vaishno Devi Mandir, New Khatanga, P.O.+P.S.- Khelgaon, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-29-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.316 of 2026 (N) registered for the offences punishable under Section 20 & 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of Ganja and from the co-accused persons, altogether 310 gm of Ganja was recovered while from the possession of the petitioner, 132 gm of Ganja was recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the seized Ganja comes under small quantity. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum-Special Judge, N.D.P.S. at Ranchi in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.316 of 2026 (N) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.07.2026-Animesh/