Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22253 (CHH)

GOPAL CHOUKSEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/1326/2018 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24957 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1326 of 2018 Gopal Chouksey S/o Shri Jagdish Chouksey Aged About 25 Years Occupation Teacher, R/o Village Sirtha Bandhawapara, Police Station Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Chhal, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Ku. Neetu Tirki D/o Shri Rujvel Tirki Aged About 32 Years R/o Permanent R/o Village Baramkela, District - Raigarh, At Present R/o Village Purnga, Police Station Chhal, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ...Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant/State: Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.06.19 19:52:05 +0530 2 applicant to press this revision petition. 2. Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/non-applicant No. 1, is present. 3. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash charge Annexure A/1 dated 08.06.2018 framed against the applicant, in the interest of justice.” 4. As per the status report received, the trial was concluded on 17.10.2019. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, and nothing survives for consideration by this Court in the present petition. 5. Consequently, the present revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Brijmohan