901-wp-304-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.304 OF 2016 Shantanu Lalaso Yadav …..Petitioner Vs. Amrita Pratapsinh Shinde …..Respondent Mr. Ishaan Kapse with Mr. V. A. Jamdar & Mr. Tejas Patil, for the Petitioner. Ms. Shivani A. Veer with Mr. R. P. Nirmal, for the Respondent. Mr. Ajit Yashwant Alaman (Power of Attorney Holder for Petitioner) is present in person. Mrs. Amrita Pratapsinh Shinde, Respondent is present in person. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : 17th JANUARY 2026 P.C.:- 1. The counsel for Petitioner and Respondent have stated that the matter is amicably settled between the parties. 2. Mr. Ajit Yashwant Alaman, Power of Attorney Holder for the Petitioner and Mrs. Amrita Pratapsinh Shinde-Respondent are present. They are verified by their respective counsel. I have also personally verified both the parties. 3. They have tendered across the bar the Consent Terms dated 16th January 2026 duly notarized before a Notary Public and the copy of Power of Attorney dated 16th December 2025 on record. Gaikwad RD 1/3 901-wp-304-2016.doc Those are taken on record and marked as Exhibit ‘X’ and ‘X1’ for identification respectively. 4. The Consent Terms are signed by Respondent and Power of Attorney Holder of Petitioner and their respective counsel. The parties acknowledge their signatures and admit the contents of Consent Terms. 5. They have stated that the matter is settled as per Consent Terms and as per the same they are ready to restore the order dated 9th July 2004 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Ichalkaranji in Tenancy Appeal No.10 of 2003 alongwith corrigendum dated 23rd July 2004 by setting aside the order of learned Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune in Revision Application No.TNC/REV/KP/161/2004 dated 23rd July 2015. They have agreed to give full effect to the order dated 9th July 2004 restoring the 32M Certificate as existed before the order dated 7th October 2003 passed by the learned Tahsildar, Hatkanangale. 6. In view of the consent terms and as I verified the Respondent and the Power of Attorney Holder of Petitioner Mr. Ajit Yashwant Gaikwad RD 2/3 901-wp-304-2016.doc Alaman, it is confirmed that as per Consent Terms, they are ready to restore the order of Sub Divisional Officer, Ichalkaranji. 7. Hence, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as per the Consent Terms. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) Gaikwad RD 3/3 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.01.19 16:25:37 +0530