Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22246 (KAR)

SMT. AKKAYAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/56790/2018 · 2026-06-16

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29153 WP No. 56790 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 56790 OF 2018 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. AKKAYAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, R/AT BETTAHALASURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH ADDL TALUK-560064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESHA T R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH ADDL TALUK, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE.N., HCGP FOR R1 & R2) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29153 WP No. 56790 of 2018 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO TAKE SUITABLE STEPS TO RECTIFY THE REVENUE ENTRIES IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.259, MEASURING TO THE EXTENT OF 2 ACRES, SITUATED AT BETTAHALASURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.05.2012, 05.02.2014, 08.01.2015 AND 12.12.2016 I.E., ANNEXURE-E, E1, E2 & E3. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Ramesha.T.R, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Spoorthy Hegde.N, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents - State. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition, seeking direction on respondent No.2 to consider the representations produced at Annexure-E series. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29153 WP No. 56790 of 2018 3. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the land in question has been granted in favour of the petitioner and therefore sought for entry in the revenue records. 4. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed to verify the original records pertaining to the subject land and thereafter take a decision in the matter in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54