APHC010343982009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1010/2009 Between: 1. PECHETTI THATARAO, S/O VENKANNA BUSINESS SAGAMCHERUVU, PALAKOL MANDAL, PJCJC, ...APPELLANT AND 1. PECHETTI JHANSI LAKSHMI, W/o Thata Rao Property Holder Devuni Thota H/o Lakshmaneswaram, Narsapuram Mandal, ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. B V RAM NARESH KUMAR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.NO: 1010/2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) The present C.M.A. is filed challenging the order and decree dated 20.04.2009 in H.M.O.P.No. 26 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Narasapuram, wherein a petition under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the husband seeking dissolution of marriage, was dismissed. 2. On 24.02.2025, this Court passed the following order: “ Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to get latest instructions in the matter. 2. No representation for the respondent. 3. Post after two weeks in the Weekly Cause List. 3. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner/appellant, even in the revised call. 4. There is no representation for the respondent also. 5. The matter pertains to the year 2009 and is listed in the ‘weekly cause list’. 3 6. The C.M.A is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 09.02.2026 Pab 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.NO: 1010/2009 DATE: 09.02.2026 Pab