Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22242 (CHH)

SATYAPRAKASH RAI v. SMT. RINKU

CRMP/1901/2023 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25126 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1901 of 2023 1 - Satyaprakash Rai S/o Mahendra Kumar Rai Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kanwar, Tehsil Sakaldiha, District Chandauli (U.P.) 2 - Priya Sharma D/o Rajkamal Sharma Aged About 30 Years R/o Gomati Nagar, Phase-Ii, Lucknow Presently R/o H. No. 1035, 1st Floor, Sanjay Gram, Opposite Rajiv Nagar, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122001 3 - Mahendra Kumar Rai S/o Late Ramji Rai Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Bhogwar, Tehsil Mugalsarai, Pargana Bhawai, District Chandauli (U.P.) 4 - Aarti Devi W/o Mahendra Kumar Rai Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Bhogwar, Tehsil Mugalsarai, Pargana Bhawai, District Chandauli (U.P.) 5 - Priti D/o Mahendra Kumar Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bhogwar, Tehsil Mugalsarai, Pargana Bhawai, District Chandauli (U.P.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Smt. Rinku W/o Satyaprakash Rai D/o Late Shyamlal Maharaj, R/o Dhelwadih, P.S. Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : None. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice (Order on Board) 19.06.2026 1. It has been informed that counsel for the petitioner is on adjustment. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 “It is therefore most humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.26/2022 (Annex P/1) filed against the petitioners under Section 12 & 23 of Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in the interest of Justice.” 3. As per the status report received from the office, the trial has already been concluded on 10.05.2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No orders as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali