RAJNISH RAJ ALIAS RAJNISH SHARMA ALIAS SHUKLA ALIAS RAJNISH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6246/2026 · 2026-07-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22239 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22239 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:22464] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6246 of 2026
------ Rajnish Raj @ Rajnish Sharma @ Shukla @ Rajnish, S/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, aged about 25 years, R/o Vastu Vihar, Phase-01, Block-SE-01, Second Manzil, P.O. & P.S. Chira Chas, Distt. Bokaro (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Yash Raj Gupta, Advocate
Mr. Lal Chandrahas Nath Shahdeo, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-29-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 120 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 627 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(2), 308(3), 308(5), 109, 352, 351(3), 111(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him for the purpose of collection of extortion. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but his name has come on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused namely Kasif Malick. It is also submitted that the allegation of firing is upon Rohit Singh. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.02.2026 as mentioned in para- 29 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the
petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 120 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 627 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.07.2026 Saroj/