1 APHC010348202014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 314/2014 Between: 1.O.GANGADHAR NAIDU,, S/O 0. NAIDU, AGED 35 YEARS, 33/11 K.V.SUB -STATION, VELIDANDLA, PULIVINDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2.K.RAMASIVA REDDY, S/O RAJA REDDY AGED 25 YEARS, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 33/11 K.V.SUB -STATION, VEERANNA GATTUPALLI, PULIVINDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.B.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S/O ESWAR REDDY, AGED 26 YEARS, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 33/11 K.V.SUB- STATION, PERNAPADU, PULIVINDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.SRI A C GANGAIAH, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIOENRS, SUPERINTENDENING ENGINEER OPERATION, APSPDCL, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2.R OBULAKONDA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIOENRS DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATION: APSPDCL, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for willful disobedience to the orders of this Hon'ble high court in W.P. No. 3118/2014 dt. 5.2.2014 and grant such other relief to the petitioners as may be deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 190 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to file this additional affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 314/2014 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.3118 of 2014 was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 13.06.2019. In view of the said order, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.03.2026 KGM 3 156 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:314 of 2014 Date: 17.03.2026 KGM