Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22228 (AP)

MT. PARASA RANGAMMA, KRISHNA DIST. v. THE SECRETARY, A.P.CO-OP.TRIBUNAL, VIJAYAWADA, & ANR.

WP/7295/2011 · 2026-02-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010343762011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7295/2011 Between: 1. MT. PARASA RANGAMMA, KRISHNA DIST., W/O. PARASA BABU SRINIVASA VARA PRASAD R/O. PRODDUTURU, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SECRETARY A P COOP TRIBUNAL VIJAYAWADA ANR, A.P. CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction, more especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not disbursing the death cum retirement benefits of Late Smt. Parasa Lakshmi Kumari to the petitioner herein as wholly arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith disburse the death cum retirement benefits of Late Smt. Parasa Lakshmi Kumari to the petitioner herein. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 9082 OF 2011 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to disburse atleast 50% of death cum retirement benefits of Late Smt. Parasa Lakshmi Kumari, who worked as U.D. Steno in A.P. Co-operative Tribunal, Vijayawada to the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVASA RAO 2. 0 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) There was no appearance on 19.01.2026, and the matter was posted for dismissal today. There is no appearance for the petitioner today also. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.02.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7295/2011 Date: 02.02.2026 KA