Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22226 (CHH)

M/S ZEPHYR-VEPL-KCL (JV) v. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED (A MINI RATNA COMPANY)

WPC/4047/2021 · 2026-06-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24624-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4047 of 2021 1 - M/s Zephyr-Vepl-Kcl (Jv) B-13a, Institutional Area, Sector-62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, Pin Code 201,301, Through Its Authorised Signatory Manish Pandey S/o Yashoda Nand Pandey, Aged About 29 Years R/o B-1, Sector-72, Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited (A Mini Ratna Company) Subsidiary Of Coal India Limited, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Secl Bhawan, Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through General Manager, Gevra Area, Gevra, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18/06/2026 1. Heard Mr. Arjit Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.06.19 11:43:43 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records leading to the impugned inaction for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may further kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ against the respondents for quashing the impugned notice dated 11.09.2021 (ANNEXURE P-15). 10.3 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the termination notice in the present petition. However, during the pendency of the petition, the final termination order has already been passed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok