Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22220 (CHH)

PARASRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2183/2023 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25123 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2183 of 2023 1 - Parasram S/o Late Chhattar Ram Sahu Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Achanakpur, P.S. Utai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2 - Rajesh @ Raju S/o Premdas Manikpuri Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Achanakpur, P.S. Utai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3 - Tarun Patil S/o Nanhu Ram Patil Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Rakhi, P.S. Patan, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Rakhi, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Xyz Nil ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice (Order on Board) 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be kindly enough to allow the petition and set-aside the order dated 03.01.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, District VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 Raipur (CG) in ST No.42/2021, and victim may be directed to be recalled for her reexamination to meet the ends of justice.” 3. As per the status report received from the office, the trial has already been concluded on 06.06.2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No orders as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali