Kimudu Rameswara Rao v. Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited
WP/21689/2013 · 2026-03-11
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22219 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22219 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010346942013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21689/2013 Between:
1. KIMUDU RAMESWARA RAO, S/O PATTALU DORA AGED 35 YEARS, OCC: NIL R/O H. NO. 65-6-2, MULAGADA HOUSING COLONY NEW GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR AT VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD HYDERABAD. 2. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HRD, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not selecting the petitioner to the post Junior Plant Attendant, inspite of the petitioner securing 62.19 marks in the tests conducted by the respondents and also the petitioner belonging to Scheduled Tribe community of Visakhapatnam District (local candidate) while selecting/appointing persons who scored less marks than the petitioner and also the action of the respondents in not considering o and disposing of the representation dt. 8.7.2013 as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and
2
consequently direct the respondents to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for selection to the subject post with reference to the marks obtained and being local candidate IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 26561 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to fill up one vacancy of Junior Plant Attendant in Upper Seeleru Hydro Electro Scheme, Visakhapatnam District, notified in Notification No.01/CGM(HR)/2010, dated 05.01.2011, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M KARUNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record the instructions as received and submits that the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner in pursuance of the directions of this Court dated 24.07.2013 and that the same was informed to the petitioner as well vide letter dated 28.10.2013, duly communicating that the petitioner was not included in the provisional list of selected candidates for the post of J.P.A.
2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
12.03.2026 PNS