IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32315 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1030 Year-2025 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rajmani Devi W/O Yogendra Sah Resident of village- Chousima, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur, Bihar- 843113 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 24-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.1030 of 2025, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, which has been lodged on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to the effect that while he was sitting on door, in the meanwhile, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons came armed with lathi ,danda and farsa and started abusing the informant, it is alleged that co-accused Shiv Shankar Sah and Ravi Shankar Sah assaulted the son of the informant namely, Amit Kumar Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32315 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 2/4 with a farsa on his head and co-accused Abhay Raj assaulted the informant on his head with an iron rod. It has been alleged that the petitioner along with her daugther-in-law assaulted the informant’s wife and son namely, Gaurav Kumar and the accused persons looted Rs. 51,000/- in cash and a golden-chain also. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady and has been implicated in the present case only due to previous dispute. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a first informant report bearing Sadar P.S. Case No. 1029 of 2025, has been lodged by the co- accused Yogendra Sah against the informant and her family members and the present case is a counter blast of the case filed by co-accused Yogendra Sah. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific allegation has been leveled against the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Shiv Shankar Sah and Ravi Shankar Sah has ben enlarged on anticipatory bail by Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court vide Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 33125 of 2026 and 33145 of 2026 respectively. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the peitioner has got a clean antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32315 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 3/4 5. Per Contra the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the rival submissions and after going through the records, it appears that the petitioner along with her daughter-in-law assaulted the informant’s wife and son namely, Gaurav Kumar. The case dairy along with injury report were called for by a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.05.2026. From perusal of the injury report of the injured Gaurav Kumar, it would transpire that he has sustained grievous injury, although the wife of the informant sustained simple injury. So far, the grant of anticipatory bail by the learned Co-ordinate Benches are concerned, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 33125 of 2026, while granting the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Co-ordinate Bench has recorded that although the informant has sustained grievous injury but the same has not been specifically attributed to the petitioner and the injury sustained by the wife of the informant is opined to be simple in nature and accordingly on the basis of the same, the learned Co-ordinate Bench proceeded to allow the anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therein. In the present case, son of the informant has sustained grievous injuries and the same has been attributed upon the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32315 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 4/4 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. shital/- (Ritesh Kumar, J) U T