Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22207 (CAL)

SAJJAD HOSSAIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/3253/2026 · 2026-06-09

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ML 73 0099..0066..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 3253 of 2026 Sajjad Hossain Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shamik Bagchi Ms. Irina Mullick …for the petitioner 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. At the time of call no one represent respondents. 3. However, petitioner is represented by learned advocate. 4. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that prayer is made in this writ petition for directing concerned police authorities to register FIR based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner. 5. In same breath it is submitted on behalf of petitioner that there is an alternative remedy available under Section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023 by approaching jurisdictional Magistrate in the event complaint of the petitioner is not transformed into an FIR. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner writ petition stands disposed of thereby 2 granting liberty to the petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate in accordance with law in pursuit of remedy. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)