Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22196 (MAD)

Mariappan v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl.(MD)/1346/2026 · 2026-03-25

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.1346 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25/03/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.1346 of 2026 Mariappan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.,By the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.. 2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Sankarankoil Town Police Station, Tenkasi District. 3. Ganapathy 4. Dhanalakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection to run the petitioners shop peacefully from the disturbance caused by the 3rd and 4th respondent and to take necessary criminal action against the 3rd respondent for trespassing into the petitioner's property and thereby preventing the petitioner from running his business. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.1346 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr. A.Arun Ramnath, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER Seeking to direct the second respondent to provide police protection to run the petitioners shop peacefully from the disturbance caused by the 3rd and 4th respondent and to take necessary criminal action against the 3rd respondent for trespassing into the petitioner's property and thereby preventing the petitioner from running his business, this writ petition is filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted to the 3rd and 4th respondents are interfering with the peaceful conduct of the shop by the petitioner, which is run in the name of style of Sri Gomathi Jawli Store situated at survey number 313/A1 at Sankarankovil Kaspa, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.1346 of 2026 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the 3rd and 4th respondents are none other than the blood kins of the petitioner and the petitioner is running the family shop which was established by the father of the petitioner, 3rd and 4th respondents. Hence, the police cannot meddle in a family dispute unless specific criminal acts are reported. 4. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedies before the appropriate civil court. No costs. 25.03.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no pnn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.1346 of 2026 L. VICTORIA GOWRI,J pnn To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sankarankoil Town Police Station, Tenkasi District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN WP CRL.(MD) No.1346 of 2026 Date : 25/03/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis