RAKHI PODDAR (BISWAS) v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA(H)/16/2026 · 2026-06-09
Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22196 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22196 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19 9.06.2026 S.D.
Ct. No. 37
Bench Id
266046 WPA (H)/16/2026
Rakhi Poddar (Biswas) Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Tapan Dutta Gupta
Mr. Parvej Anam
Mr. Rituparna Ghosh
Mr. Sourav Sardar
….For the Petitioner
Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder, Ld. A.A.G.,
Mr. Aditya Mondal
….For the State
Affidavit-in-opposition filed in Court be taken on record.
Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the missing person was recovered. Missing person went with the mother when the missing person was produced in Court.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks directions for filing of affidavit-in-reply.
In a writ of habeas corpus, since the missing person stands recovered and since the missing person as an adult, chose to be with his mother, we are not minded to pass any further orders. Question, therefore, of permitting the petitioner to use an affidavit-in-reply does not arise. We clarify
2 that the statements made in the affidavit-in- opposition are deemed to be denied by the petitioner.
In such circumstances, WPA (H)/16/2026 is disposed of without any order as to cost.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)