Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22192 (AP)

Giduthuri Appala Venkata Ravi Kumar v. Smt. Giduthuri Atchuta Vani

CRLRC/593/2021 · 2026-02-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010340572021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 593/2021 Between: 1. GIDUTHURI APPALA VENKATA RAVI KUMAR,, S/O GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O H.NO. 3394, 1ST FLOOR, ROAD NO.5, NEW MIG PHASE-II, BHEL, LINGAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT GIDUTHURI ATCHUTA VANI, W/O GAV RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT SRIVATHSA ENCLAVE, VUDA LAYOUT, G-1 BLOCK, H.NO. 58-14-16/4/1, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. GIDUTHURI JAYARAM, S/O GAV RAVI KUMAR, BEING MINOR,REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN G.ATCHUTA VANI, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O SRIVATHSA ENCLAVE, VUDA LAYOUT, G-1, BLOCK, H.NO. 58-14-16/4/1 MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM (PETITIONERS) 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to (i)Allow the Crl.R.C. by setting aside the order dt 25-6-2018 passed in M.P.No. 45 of 2017 in O.P.No. 1000 of 2015 on the file of trhe Judge, Family Court-cum-V Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam (ii)And to gran IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of days in filing the above Criminal Revision Case, in the interest of justiCe, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the execution of the order passed in in M.P.No. 45 of 2017 in O.P.No. 1000 of 2015 on the file of trhe Judge, Family Court¬cum-V Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V HEMANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 593/2021 ORDER: As per the information received from the Registry, the O.P.No.1000 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum- V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, has been dismissed as not pressed. 2. Sri V. Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that recording the same, the Criminal Revision Case may be closed. 3. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, is present. 4. In view of the dismissal of O.P. No. 1000 of 2015 as not pressed, the relief sought in this Criminal Revision Case does not survive for consideration and has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date 25.02.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 593/2021 Date 25.02.2026 KKV 22