APHC010334342017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31484/2017 Between: 1. DR PADMAJA, CHITTOOR DIST, W/O K. SRINIVASA RREDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS LECTURER (KAYACHIKITSA), SRI VENKATESWARA AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL & HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPTI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P 3. THE JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPTI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. DR B HARINADHACHARY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER LECTURER (KAYA CHIKITSA), SRI VENKATESWAARA AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo Roc.No. TL10/7876/2014, dated 16.08.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, vindictive, illegal and 2 W.P.No.31484 of 2017 violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the Memo Roc.No. TL10/7876/2014, dated 16.08.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent and consequently set aside the appointment of the 4th respondent as Lecturer and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Prayer is amended as per C.O. dt 3/10/17 in WPMP 40319/17 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B KAVITA YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW(AP) 2. G TUHIN KUMAR 3. C SRINIVASA BABA 4. CH MURALI KRISHNA (SC FOR TTD) 5. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO 3 W.P.No.31484 of 2017 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the instant writ petition. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:05.02.2026 Dvs 4 W.P.No.31484 of 2017 164 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.31484 of 2017 Date: 05.02.2026 Dvs