GAURAV ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/84/2022 · 2026-10-12
Om Prakash Shukla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22178 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22178 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 84/2022 p. 1 $~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010160062022 + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 84/2022
GAURAV ENTERPRISES
.....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Harshit Singh, Mr. Satyam Roy, and Mr. Anant Dev, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT .....Judgement Debtor Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Ms. Sanskriti Nautiyal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL) %
12.10.2026
1. At the outset, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Decree Holder submits that the conciliation process is going on between the parties. He, accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file it again, as and when situation arises and after satisfying on the aspect of stamp duty as per the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and in line of the judgment passed by this Court in M/s URC Construction (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India1.
2. However, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Judgment Debtor has objected and submits that there is no conciliation process going on.
1 OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 155/2026
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 84/2022 p. 2 3. In view of the submissions made by learned Counsel for the Decree Holder, leave and liberty, as sought, is granted.
4. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/gunn