Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22174 (DEL)

PARAS RAM v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

CONT.CAS(C)/398/2026 · 2026-10-09

Neena Bansal Krishna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010090302026 + CONT.CAS(C) 398/2026 PARAS RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Ms. Shreya Garg, Mr. Bhaskar Dongwal and Mr. Aryan Singh, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, SC for DDA with Mr. Siddhartha Goswami and Mr. Aditya Sachdeva, Advs. Mr. Prashant Diwan, Govt. Counsel for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 09.10.2026 1. The present Petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 had been filed against the non-compliance of the Order dated 21.08.2025 in W.P (C) 12669/2025, whereby the Petition was disposed of with the following directions: “8. In these circumstances, the impugned order dated 21.09.2021 is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the District Magistrate, North, Alternative Branch, GNCTD, for a fresh decision in accordance with law. Naturally, if it is found that the petitioner is ineligible on account of ownership of any other land which falls within the bar contemplated by the policy, that ground remains open to the respondents. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:47 9. The writ petition, alongwith the pending applications, is disposed of in these terms.” 2. The learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has submitted that a matter was decided afresh vide Order dated 08.10.2026 and the copy of the Order is placed on record. 3. According to this Order, the Petitioner is entitled to an allotment of an alternative land of Residential Plot admeasuring 40 sq. yds as per his seniority, subject to the condition stated therein. 4. In view of the aforesaid, since the Order has been complied with, the present Petition is disposed of. 5. The rights of the Petitioner to pursue the matter with the DDA is left open. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:47