Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22172 (JHR)

RAVINDRA KUMAR SAH ALIAS RAVINDRA KR. SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5436/2026 · 2026-07-28

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:22489 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5436 of 2026 1. Ravindra Kumar Sah @ Ravindra Kr. Sah, Son of Late Mangru Sah 2. Bipin Kumar Sah @ Bipin Kr. Sah son of late Singheshwar Sah … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. --- 03/28.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No. 62 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 109(1), 333, 326(g), 324(5), 96, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 21.04.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted on 16.06.2026 and the case has already been committed. He has further submitted that so far as the victim girl is concerned, she was major and she had willfully eloped with one Muni Lal Sah, got married with him and is staying with her in laws. So far as the petitioners are concerned, they are uncle and brother-in-law of Muni Lal Sah, to whom the victim was married. He has further submitted that the informant and others have suffered simple injuries. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that even the house of the informant was burnt. 5. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that later on the house was repaired and needful was done. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon going through the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, this court finds that the victim had gone with Muni Lal Sah on her ( 2026:JHHC:22489 ) 2 own will and got married with him and she does not want to contest the case. Considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Sahibganj, in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No. 62 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 28.07.2026 Uploaded on 29.07.2026 Binit/