Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:22199 ) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4095 of 2026
------
1. Sudha Kujur, aged about 29 years, D/o Timothius Kujur, R/o Village- Chaha Fulwar Toli, PO- Telgaon, PS- Gumla, District- Gumla, Jharkhand.
2. Sudhir Kujur, aged about 29 years, S/o Timothius Kujur, R/o Village- Chaha Fulwar Toli, PO- Telgaon, PS- Gumla, District- Gumla, Jharkhand.
.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. K. S. Nanda, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P.
------
02/27.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.140 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 316 (2), 318 (4), 115 (2), 126 (2), 351 (2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned CJM, Gumla.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this case is counter-blast to the case lodged by the petitioner no.1 in which she has alleged that informant had established physical relationship on the pretext of marriage and also tried to convert her religion.
4. He next submits that the false allegations have been made of cheating money and not returning the money invested in poultry farm. He submits that there is nothing on record to suggest that any transaction has taken place between the petitioners and the informant. On these grounds he submits that petitioners may be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of taking the money and not returning the same.
6. Considering that the 1st FIR has been lodged by the petitioner no.1 alleging that informant of the present case has established physical relationship on the pretext of false promise of marriage and also tried to change the religion and thereafter the present case has been lodged. There is nothing on record to suggest that there is any
( 2026:JHHC:22199 ) 2
transaction between the petitioners and the informant, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.140 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
27.07.2026 Sandeep/
Uploaded/