Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 22167 (BOM)
SHAIKH JIBRAIL @ PINKI S/O SHAIKH RAZZAK v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO, PARDI, NAGPUR
BA/1259/2025 · 2026-01-08
Shri M M Nerlikar
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 20 BA 1259.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 1259/2025 (Shaikh Jibrail @ Pinki S/o Shaikh Razzak Vs.The State of Maharashtra) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.S. Alik, Advocate for applicant. Mr. A.R. Chutke, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR,
J .
DATED : 08/01/2026. Heard.
2. The learned APP submits that earlier bail application was rejected on 13.07.2024. There is no change in circumstances. He submits that nine witnesses have already been examined. Very few witnesses are remained to be examined. The side of the prosecution would be concluded within a month or two months. On
consideration of this fact, the learned counsel appearing for applicant seeks withdrawal of the application.
3. Permission granted.
4.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
( M. M. NERLIKAR
, J.)
Gohane