Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22163 (DEL)

M/S ENN ENN ADVERTISING AND MARKETING v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

W.P.(C)/15274/2026 · 2026-10-13

Saurabh Banerjee

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010497582026 + W.P.(C) 15274/2026, CM APPL. 71699-71700/2026 M/S ENN ENN ADVERTISING AND MARKETING.....Petitioner Through: Mr Aditya Dhawan, Mr. Saurabh Duggal, Ms. Kiran Dhawan, Mr. Tushar Bukkle, Mr. Aditya Gupta, Mr. Anirudh Negi and Mr. S.M Adnan Hussain Advs. (7838603016) versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Bhardwaj, SPC with Mr. Shivam Bhardwaj, GP for UOI (9999553353) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 13.10.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction commanding the respondents, to produce the entire original record pertaining to the present contract between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2; b) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned termination notice dated 29.09.2026, being completely arbitrary and illegal; c) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, order or direction commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to execute the contract, in terms and conditions of the contract; d) Issue any other and further appropriate writ, order or direction, as deemed just and proper, in the facts and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:48:51 circumstances stated herein below in favor of the petitioner and against the respondents; and/or e) pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, without adverting to merits involved, seeks to withdraw the present petition, provided that the present petition be treated as a fresh representation to the respondent no.2, in ignorance of its earlier representations dated 01.10.2026 and 05.10.2026. 3. Accordingly, the said respondent no.2 is directed to treat the present petitioner as a fresh representation by the petitioner, as also to decide the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks. 4. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be accorded a personal hearing prior thereto, if and so required. 5. Also, it is directed that a copy of the final order adjudicating the representation of the petitioner shall be communicated/ sent to it by the respondent no.2 within a period of three days thereafter. 6. The petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the petitioner’s right to avail appropriate remedies, in accordance with law, if, as and when required. SAURABH BANERJEE, J OCTOBER 13, 2026/rr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:48:51