Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7557 OF 2013 (MV) BETWEEN:
1. THIMMAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
2. JAYAMMA W/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O BORAGANAHALLY VILLAGE HIRENALLURU HOBLI KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMANGALORE DISTRICT 577 548 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GIREESHA S N, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANJUNATH N D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BASAMMA W/O LATE B T NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O BORAGANAHALLY VILLAGE HIRENALLURU HOBLI KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMANGALORE DISTRICT NOW HAVING RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BASAMMA D/O MYLARAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT HOSAKUNDUR VILLAGE
Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
KASABA HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK 577 527 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
2.
MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC K H ROAD BANGALORE (HASSAN DEPOT) INTERNAL SECURITY FUND SARIGE BHAVANA BANGALORE 560 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GURUDATH V R, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. B. L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.1.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.244/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT, HOSADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. The present appeal is filed impugning the judgment and award dated 31.1.2013 passed in MVC No.244/2011 on the file of the Itinerary Senior Civil Judge, Additional MACT., Hosadurga1. The Tribunal, vide the impugned judgment has allowed the claim petition filed by the respondent No.1/claimant
1 hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal'
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
(wife of the deceased) and awarded a total compensation of `6,47,000/- together with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The mother and father of the deceased were arrayed as respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively before the Tribunal. Out of the compensation awarded, no portion has been apportioned in favour of respondent Nos.2 and 3. Hence, the parents of the deceased have filed the present appeal seeking for enhancement in the quantum of compensation as also for appropriate apportionment in the quantum of compensation.
2. The findings of the Tribunal on negligence and liability are not under challenge and have attained finality.
3. The deceased (B.T. Nagaraj) was aged 30 years as on date of the accident i.e., on 17.07.2010. He was stated to be a driver. But no documents have been produced to demonstrate his income. The Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased as `4,000/- per month. Having regard to the date of the accident, the income of the deceased is re-assessed as `5,500/- per month.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
4. 40% is required to be added towards future prospects in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED -V- PRANAY SETHI & OTHERS2. 1/3rd is to be deducted towards personal expenses. The Tribunal has applied appropriate multiplier of '17', which is just and proper. Accordingly, the loss of dependency is re-assessed as (`5,500/- + 40% - 1/3rd x 12 x 17) `10,47,200/- as against `6,12,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.
5. The loss of consortium is required to be awarded to the wife as well as to the parents of the deceased in terms of the
judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram and others3. Accordingly, a sum of (`40,000 x 3) `1,20,000/- is awarded towards the same as against `10,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.
6. Compensation of `15,000/- each is required to be awarded towards funeral expenses and loss of estate. Hence, the
2 (2017) 16 SCC 680 3 (2018) 18 SCC 130
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
compensation awarded by the Tribunal on other conventional heads is modified accordingly.
7. The compensation is re-assessed as under:
Sl.No Compensation Head Amount Awarded by the Tribunal (`) Amount awarded by this Court (`) 1 Towards Loss of Dependency 6,12,000.00 10,47,200.00 2 Towards Funeral expenses 10,000.00 15,000.00 3 Towards Loss of Consortium 10,000.00 1,20,000.00 4 Towards Loss of Love and Affection 10,000.00 5 Towards of Transportation of Dead Body 5,000.00 00
6 Loss of estate 00 15,000.00
Total 6,47,000.00 11,97,200.00
8. Out of the total compensation as re-assessed by this Court, 60% shall be payable to the wife i.e., (`11,97,200x60%) `7,18,320/-.
9. Since the Tribunal has awarded a sum of `6,47,000/- only to the wife, out of the enhanced amount, the balance compensation of `71,320/- shall be payable to the wife
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
(claimant before the Tribunal/respondent No.1 in the present appeal).
10. Out of the balance amount of `4,78,880/-, a sum of `3,00,000/- shall be payable to the mother (Respondent No.3 before the Tribunal/Appellant No.2 in the present appeal) and the balance sum of `1,78,880/- shall be payable to the father (Respondent No.2 before the Tribunal/Appellant No.1 in the present appeal).
11. The said apportioned amounts together with interest shall be payable to the wife, mother and father respectively.
12. Hence, the following:
ORDER i. The above appeal is partly allowed; ii. The
judgment and award dated 31.1.2013 passed in MVC No.244/2011 by the Itinerary Senior Civil Judge, Additional MACT., Hosadurga is modified to the extent holding that the appellants and respondent No.1 shall be entitled to a further sum of `5,50,200/- together with
- 7 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of payment in addition to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. In all other respects, the
judgment and award of the Tribunal remains unaltered; iii. The enhanced compensation shall be apportioned in the following manner: (a) a sum of `71,320/- together with accrued interest shall be payable to respondent No.1/claimant; (b) a sum of `3,00,000/- together with accrued interest shall be payable to appellant No.2/respondent No.3 before the Tribunal; c) a sum of `1,78,880/- together with accrued interest shall be payable to appellant No.1/respondent No.2 before the Tribunal; iv. Respondent No.2 (in the present appeal) /KSRTC
shall deposit the enhanced amount together with accrued interest within a period of six weeks from date;
- 8 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17557 MFA No. 7557 of 2013
v. Out of the apportioned amount, a sum of `2,00,000/- awarded in favour of the appellant No.2 shall be kept in a Fixed Deposit in any Nationalised Bank of the choice of appellant No.2 for a period of two years, upon expiry of which, the deposit amount together with accrued interest shall be released in favour of appellant No.2 (mother of the deceased) without any further orders either from the Tribunal or from this Court in this regard. The remaining amounts awarded to appellants and respondent No.1 (in this appeal) together with accrued interest shall be released/disbursed in favour of the said parties; vi. The Registry to draw the modified award accordingly; vii. Records be transmitted to the Tribunal forthwith;
No costs.
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
BS - List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17