Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22157 (AP)

J VEEABHADRAM, W.G.DIST v. J.DEVI SATYAVENI, E.G.DIST

CMA/1004/2015 · 2026-01-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010332702015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1004/2015 Between: 1. J VEEABHADRAM, W.G.DIST, S/O. LATE SRI NAGESWARA RAO HINDU, AGE 41 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER R/O. T-2, BOMMARILLU RESIDENCY, VIDYANAGAR ELURU - 534 001, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. J DEVI SATYAVENI E G DIST, W/o. Sri Veerabhadram D/o. Sri Kantipudi Venkata Subba Rao R/o. Bobbilanka, Torredu - 533 293 Seethanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the Decree and Order made in G.O.P.No.438 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry, dated 03-11-2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 2092 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant direction to the Respondent to permit the Petitioner to see his minor children viz , Master Jasthi Viswanadham Varun Kumar (11 years) and Jasthi Harsha Vardhan Sai Srikanth (9 years) on every Sunday in the house of the Respondent, pending disposal of the present C.M.A. and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1004/2015 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father seeking custody of minor children under Section 7(A)(B) r/w. Section 25 of Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father. 2. Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the minor children have attained majority. 3. Since the minor children now attained majority, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.01.2026 AG 176 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1004/2015 Dated: 06.01.2026 AG