Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22156 (CHH)

SUBRAT BHATTACHARYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/828/2025 · 2026-06-18

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25158 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 828 of 2025 1 - Subrat Bhattacharya S/o Late Bireshwar Bhattacharya, Aged About 64 Years R/o F-19, South City Nagar-1, Near Park, Gurugram (Gudgaon), Police Station-Sector 40, District Gurugram (Haryana), Permanent Address-72/1, Punjabi Bag, Police Station Punjabi Bag Delhi West 2 - Gurmeet Singh S/o Late Shri Kulwant Singh, Aged About 60 Years R/o Dp-9 Muarya Enclave, In Front Of Dav School, Pritam Pura, Shalimar Bag, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi North West ... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Manendragarh, District Koriya Now Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur (M.C.B.) Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Soumya Rai, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Heard Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present Criminal Revision has been filed by the applicants with following prayer: RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 “ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleaded to set-aside the impugned order dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) and further be pleased to discharge the applicants from Section 10 of Chhattisgarh Protection of Depositors’ Interest Act, 2005, in the interest of justice. ” 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants have already been acquitted, hence, the present criminal revision has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, the present criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Let a certified copy of this order be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar