2026:JHHC:22258 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6697 of 2026 Ishahak Ansari, aged about 23 years, S/o- Yakub Ansari @ Yakub Miya, R/o Village-Butberiya, P.O. + P.S. Narayanpur, District- Jamtara. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, APP For the Informant : Mr. Bhaswat Prakash, Advocate --- 04/28.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2026 in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned C.J.M, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on the face of the first information report, the informant of the case was married and the petitioner developed love relationship with her and established physical relationship which ultimately led to her divorce. Thereafter, the petitioner did not marry her, then the victim was married with another person and thereafter she was again divorced and the petitioner continued to establish physical relationship with her on the pretext of marriage and then she was pregnant by seven months. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even at the time of first incident, the victim was married and as per the first information report, the petitioner and the victim were in love relation. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State as well as the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the physical relationship was established on the pretext of marriage. 2026:JHHC:22258 2 6. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge sheet has already been submitted. 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegation on the face of the first information report, it appears that even at the time of initial relationship, the victim lady was already married. Considering, the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 28.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-29.07.2026