IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1858 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Bhawna Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate, for respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 07, 2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?